Court verdict: Serengeti for migration, not highway

by Fran
This has been seen 1,265 times.
Justice has prevailed: no paved highway will bisect the precious Serengeti
Justice has prevailed: no paved highway will bisect the precious Serengeti
  • The East African Court of Justice has ruled against the development of a highway bisecting the Serengeti National Park.
  • This means that the Tanzanian Government will no longer be able to go ahead as planned - route alternatives and road options need to be re-considered.
  • The court's verdict has strengthened hope that the Serengeti and its Great Migration will be protecting for generations to come.
Proposed Serengeti Highway. The East African Court of Justice ruled that a bitumen road as showed here, passing through the Serengeti, is illegal.
Proposed Serengeti Highway. The East African Court of Justice ruled that a bitumen road as showed here, passing through the Serengeti, is illegal.

For two decades, Africa and wildlife enthusiasts across the world battled to save the Serengeti and the Great Migration from the planned Serengeti highway. Every year with the rain season in East Africa, the Great Migration takes place. Wildebeest and zebra in numbers well over a million animals migrate across the Serengeti towards the Masai Mara in what is described as one of the last genuinely impressive natural phenomena. The magnitude of this yearly migration tells the story of true Africa – and the animals that still roam freely in undisturbed plains. But the Tanzanian government planned to develop a highway, the Serengeti highway as it became known, through the Serengeti National Park linking to Rwanda, Burundi and the Congo. Described as a 53 km (33 miles) super highway, the highway planned to bisect the Serengeti right in the migration pathway. Following international outcry, the Tanzanian Government eventually placed their plans for a highway on hold. This was further strengthened by a court case initiated by the African Network for Animal Welfare (ANAW) against the Tanzanian Government. The court case ruling expected to direct the way-forward. Now, the court has decided.

Ruling against Serengeti Highway

After an extensive review, the East African Court of Justice finally ruled: constructing a bitumen road across the Serengeti is considered unlawful. The wildlife migration will continue; human transport on a super highway will not. With international ecological protection including a UNESCO World Heritage Site listing, there is no doubt that the East African Court of Justice’s verdict is right in line with international thinking and international recognition of the Serengeti’s ecological and environmental importance. Home to an abundance of African wildlife, the Serengeti wilderness is a critical ecological and environmental safehouse for the entire Africa – something which the East African Court of Justice confirmed by acknowledging that the Serengeti needs best possible protection.   

Four years in court

For the past four years, ANAW has advocated in every possible way to protect the Serengeti from this development. They fought for a permanent court injunction to ensure the existence of the Serengeti ecosystem for generations to come. But in all of this, ANAW still acknowledges Tanzania’s need for national development – as development in Africa is considered central for the eradication of poverty, low life expectancy, health threats and other social concerns. Yet, ANAW reasoned that it is the Serengeti and the protection of this environment, and not the Serengeti highway, that will bring forth future benefit.  

Continued lobbying for the highway

Although the court’s verdict is a huge step forward for the conserving of the Serengeti, some organizations remain watchful. The court’s verdict explicitly rules against a bitumen, or asphalt, road – this means that other options could potentially be taken forward – such as a gravel road. And in an African context, a gravel road is still considered an option. The majority of affected parties and organizations involved feel that there should only be one option considered, and that is the option of a Southern route alternative. This Southern route will completely bypass the Serengeti National Park, and is therefore supported by two key parties including the Tanzania National Park and the World Bank. It is expected that this Southern alternative will not impact the Great Migration at all, hence why it is considered such a feasible alternative, protecting wildlife but still allowing the option of economic and infrastructure development.

The joyous news that the East African Court of Justice has declared the construction of a bitumen road through the Serengeti as illegal has brought hope and confidence for those who have dutifully defended the Serengeti. The ruling has fixed further confidence in East Africa’s legal system and its power to protect its natural resources. Now, if there has to be a highway, the next step is to secure the adoption of a Southern bypass, leaving the Serengeti and its wildlife to roam freely well into the future. 

Sources and credits

Photo credits: some rights reserved by Wajahat Mahmood via flickr [Creative Commons]

Like this article? Go on, give it a kudu!
 
3 people gave this article kudus.
This article is part of a series
Court verdict: Serengeti for migration, not highway
1 Comment
If you want to discuss this further, please leave a comment.
mathewadams said
Thumbs up for the East African Court
03 October
Sign in to leave a comment

Learn more about

Articles by Fran

Recent articles

Shortlisted tour operators You can shortlist up to
5 tour operators